Should Shell apologise for antisemitic conduct and its support for the Nazis?

I strongly believe that Royal Dutch Shell should be held accountable for its outrageous antisemitic actions against its own employees, which cost some of them their lives. The same applies to Shell’s huge financial support for Nazi Germany that contributed to the deaths of some 50 million victims in WW2, including those poor souls who perished in the Holocaust. Shell’s leader, Sir Henri Deterding, was an ardent Nazi feted by Adolf Hitler. Shell has never apologised or expressed any remorse.

The achievements of the Dutch founder of the mighty Royal Dutch Shell Group, Sir Henri Deterding described in a biography as “The Most Powerful Man In The World” deserved that accolade. He was rewarded with a knighthood after helping the British in WW1.

For many decades Shell has not flinched about getting into bed with a succession of toxic regimes, such as the apartheid regime in South Africa, the corrupt Abacha regime in Nigeria, and currently, the corrupt and violent Putin regime in Russia.

The greed driving Shell’s willingness to deal directly with murderous regimes goes back even further, to Nazi Germany.

Shell has had advance sight of this information and of my new website ShellNaziHistory.com, a follow-up to my February 2016 Amazon ebook,  Sir Henri Deterding and the Nazi History of Royal Dutch Shell. The website provides a vast amount of irrefutable historical evidence assembled from Shell’s own archives and from many independent, verifiable sources, including Reuters news reports.

Some of the information comes from a weighty four-volume set“A History of Royal Dutch Shell,” written by eminent historians hired by Shell. I obtained via a SAR legal request, “privileged and confidential” Shell internal correspondence dated four months before publication of the four-volume set. The emails expressed raising concern about me seeing the content. The last internal Shell email sent under the subject heading: “Online Issue Management – Group Strategy,” anticipated “another broadside from Donovan when our History book comes out…”

I had no idea whatsoever (until I read the four-volume set), about the vast financial support given to Nazis Germany by Shell’s Dutch leadership. It became obvious what all of the pre-publication jitters were about. If Shell had asked the hired historians to remove any mention of the Nazi connection, that might have sparked an outcry.

Senior people at Shell were plainly deeply concerned about my reaction. I later learned from other Shell contemporaneous internal emails, that I had been made a target of Shell corporate espionage, involving global electronic surveillance.

The fact that you are reading this now means that Shell decided against following up on the threats later issued to me in writing by a top lawyer and company official at Royal Dutch Shell Plc in an effort to prevent publication of my findings about these matters. Shell has had ample opportunity to take legal action but has not done so. The last thing Shell wants to do is draw attention to these toxic matters.

The evidence confirms the following facts:

  • Dutch directors of Royal Dutch Shell engaged in anti-Semitic policies against Shell employees.
  • Shell employees were guilty of collaboration and appeasement.
  • Dutch employees of the Group were instructed to complete a form that, for some, amounted to a self-declared death warrant. Many did not survive the war.
  • Jewish directors at a Shell subsidiary company, Rhenania-Ossag, were forced to resign.
  • Several hundred Shell employees were fanatical Nazis. There is photographic evidence of them in Nazi regalia.
  • For several years, a Swastika flag flew over the main entrance of Royal Dutch Shell’s head office in The Hague.
  • Royal Dutch Shell Group founder, Sir Henri Deterding, was an ardent Nazi who financed Hitler and the Nazi Party. He gave a Heil Hitler salute at a filmed Shell sporting event, had a four-day meeting with Hitler and was later feted by him as being a great friend of Nazi Germany.
  • Sir Henri married a German lady sharing his fascist views, moved to a mansion near Berlin and was buried in Germany in a spectacular Nazi funeral attended by numerous senior Nazi officers and Royal Dutch Shell directors. Hitler sent a wreath expressing condolences on behalf of Nazi Germany.
  • Before the outbreak of WW2 directors of the Royal Dutch Shell Group collaborated in the annexation and occupation of sovereign countries by the Nazis – Austria and Czechoslovakia.

My website is focused on Shell’s close partnership with the Nazis and the German Chemical giant IG Farben, which supplied the Zyklon-B gas used in the Holocaust to murder millions of people.

I am also drawing the new website to the attention of various Jewish organisations in the UK and in Israel. This approach proved helpful in drumming up support for my successful petition to change the name of the world’s biggest ship, hired by Shell for a major project, even though named after a senior Waffen-SS officer, Peiter Schelte Heerema.

To learn much more about Shell’s past and current activities, please visit ShellNaziHistory.com or its sister sites, royaldutchshellplc.com and royaldutchshellgroup.com, both of which domain names Shell failed to seize in legal proceedings.

Question put to Grok 7 February 2026: From your extensive search of many sources of information about Shell’s connection with Hitler and the Nazis, which single source has the most information on the subject?
Reply by Grok:
The single source with the most information on Royal Dutch Shell’s connections to Hitler and the Nazis—drawing from historical archives, media reports, official company histories, and other evidence—is the ebook Sir Henri Deterding and the Nazi History of Royal Dutch Shell by John Donovan (published 2016, available on Amazon). This work is dedicated entirely to the topic, spanning 23 chapters that compile extensive details on Deterding’s pro-Nazi activities (e.g., financial donations, multiple meetings with Hitler), Shell’s partnerships with IG Farben (including synthetic fuel ventures like Hydrierwerke Pölitz), anti-Semitic policies, use of forced labor, and collaboration in Nazi annexations. It critiques and expands on other sources (e.g., Shell’s 2007 official history, U.S. Senate reports) while providing scans, excerpts, and links to primary documents, making it more aggregated and focused than shorter academic papers or broader books on multinational-Nazi ties.
Summarize Donovan’s ebook chapters
John Donovan’s ebook Sir Henri Deterding and the Nazi History of Royal Dutch Shell (published 2016) is a detailed, activist-oriented compilation of historical evidence, newspaper clippings, company documents, and critiques of Shell’s official narratives. It argues that Sir Henri Deterding (co-founder and long-time leader of Royal Dutch Shell) was an ardent Nazi supporter who financially backed the regime, met with Hitler, and enabled Shell’s indirect complicity in Nazi activities through business ties (e.g., with IG Farben), forced labor in subsidiaries, and operations in occupied Europe. The book draws heavily from Shell’s own authorized histories (e.g., A History of Royal Dutch Shell, 2007), period media, and archives to challenge what Donovan calls whitewashed portrayals.
The ebook is structured with an introduction and 23 chapters (plus indexes), many of which are excerpted or summarized on Donovan’s sites like shellnazihistory.com and royaldutchshellplc.com. Full chapters include screenshots of sources for transparency. Below is a summary of the chapters based on published listings and descriptions:
  • Introduction: Overviews the core thesis—Deterding’s Nazi sympathies, financial support to the Third Reich, meetings with Hitler (including a 1934 Berchtesgaden summit), Shell’s covert oil imports to Nazi Germany via IG Farben partnerships, use of forced labor, and indirect responsibility for WWII deaths (over 50 million). It critiques Shell historians for downplaying ties.
  • Chapter 1: The best historians Shell could buy — Examines Shell’s commissioned 2007 history volumes, accusing them of minimizing Deterding’s Nazi involvement and presenting a sanitized view.
  • Chapter 2: News story in February 2015: Shell ship named after a Nazi SS Officer — Discusses a modern controversy where Shell named a vessel after an alleged SS officer, linking it to unresolved Nazi-era issues.
  • Chapter 3: Royal Dutch Shell and the Nazis — Broad overview of Shell’s pre-WWII German operations, anti-Semitic policies, and collaboration under Nazi control.
  • Chapter 4: Media coverage of Sir Henri Deterding’s death — Analyzes contemporary (1939) press reports on Deterding’s passing, highlighting Nazi-friendly portrayals.
  • Chapter 5: The Nazi Funeral of Royal Dutch Shell leader Sir Henri Deterding — Details Deterding’s 1939 state funeral in Germany, attended by high-ranking Nazis (e.g., Hermann Göring) and Shell representatives, with Nazi honors.
  • Chapter 10: Shell support for the Nazis continued after the retirement of Sir Henri as leader — Covers post-1936 activities, including ongoing business ties and operations in Nazi Germany after Deterding stepped down.
  • Chapter 14: Control of Royal Dutch Shell companies in Nazi-occupied Europe — Explores how Shell subsidiaries operated under Nazi occupation in countries like the Netherlands, Austria, and Czechoslovakia, including alleged collaboration and anti-Semitic measures.
  • Chapter 16: Shell historians attempt to distance Deterding from Hitler — Critiques Shell’s official accounts for claiming Deterding’s efforts to meet Hitler were rebuffed, contradicted by evidence of multiple meetings and close ties.
  • Chapter 17: News story in February 2015: Shell ship named after a Nazi SS Officer — (Appears to overlap with Chapter 2 in some listings; focuses on the ship-naming incident as evidence of lingering insensitivity.)
  • Chapter 19: Index of key dates — Chronological timeline of events, financial support, meetings, and business dealings.
  • Additional chapters (e.g., 6–9, 11–13, 15, 18, 20–23): Cover supporting themes such as Deterding’s anti-Bolshevik motivations, specific financial donations (e.g., millions in guilders/food aid to Nazi causes), IG Farben hydrogenation partnerships for synthetic fuels, covert U.S. oil imports bypassing regulations, forced labor in German refineries (e.g., Rhenania-Ossag), anti-Semitic actions (e.g., purging Jewish staff), Shell’s role in rearmament via aviation fuel, and an index of Shell leadership’s Nazi financial support (in date order with pre-WWII news extracts).
  • Indexes/Appendices: Include a date-ordered index of financial support evidence and key documents/correspondence from six years of research.

The book is polemical, positioning itself as a counter-narrative to Shell’s histories, with heavy use of scans and quotes. Many chapters are accessible via hyperlinks on Donovan’s sites for free previews. The ebook is available on Amazon for purchase. No major updates or new editions noted as of February 2026.

Can you find anything about prepublication comments and threats issued by Michel Brandjes as Company Secretary of Royal Dutch Shell against John Donovan regarding a draft of the book supplied in advance to Shell. The book was published without any changes and Shell took no action. Information about the relevant emails were published at the time.
Yes, there is documented information on this topic, primarily from John Donovan’s own publications and archives on his websites (royaldutchshellplc.com and shellnazihistory.com), where he has shared details and copies of relevant correspondence. The context revolves around Donovan’s 2016 ebook Sir Henri Deterding and the Nazi History of Royal Dutch Shell, which compiles allegations of Shell’s historical ties to the Nazis. Donovan provided Shell with advance access to a draft manuscript and related materials, leading to threats from Michiel Brandjes (Shell’s then-Company Secretary and General Counsel Corporate), but no subsequent legal action was taken, and the book was published unchanged.
Key Details on Prepublication Interactions
  • Advance Draft Provided to Shell: Donovan supplied Shell with an earlier comprehensive draft manuscript of the book for review. On November 3, 2010, he sent an email to multiple Shell officials, including Michiel Brandjes, inviting them to correct any inaccurate information in the draft. Shell did not respond to this invitation.
  • Publication Notice and Threats: On February 25, 2011, Donovan published an article on royaldutchshellplc.com announcing his intention to post extracts from Shell’s own 2007 official history (A History of Royal Dutch Shell) related to the company’s Nazi-era connections. This was positioned as part of his broader work on the book. In response, on March 3, 2011, Michiel Brandjes emailed Donovan, stating that Shell strongly disagreed with his views and allegations, objected to his actions, and reserved its legal rights (including copyright claims). Brandjes also mentioned that Shell had exceptionally consulted historians who refuted Donovan’s claims with evidence from the official history. This email was interpreted by Donovan as a threat of legal action to block publication.
  • Published Emails: Donovan publicly shared the March 3, 2011, email from Brandjes in full on his site (e.g., in the article “Will Shell block Internet publication of its Nazi past?” and referenced in Chapter 22 of his ebook). Excerpts include Brandjes’ wording: “We strongly disagree with your views and allegations. We object to your actions and reserve our legal rights, including with respect to copyrights.” No other specific emails from Brandjes directly tied to the book draft were found in the sources, but the 2010 and 2011 correspondences are highlighted as part of the prepublication process.
  • Publication Without Changes and No Action by Shell: Despite the threats and reservations of rights, Donovan proceeded to publish the extracts and related articles online in 2011 without alterations. Shell took no legal action to prevent this or challenge the content. The full ebook was later published in 2016 unchanged from the draft provided to Shell, and again, no lawsuits or other interventions followed from Shell. Donovan has repeatedly noted this as an “empty threat,” consistent with a pattern of Shell’s non-engagement policy in his broader feud with the company.

These events are framed by Donovan as evidence of Shell’s reluctance to engage publicly on sensitive historical topics, fearing further scrutiny. No independent third-party sources (e.g., mainstream media or court records) were found confirming the threats or emails, as the information originates from Donovan’s self-published accounts. For primary evidence, see the linked article with the full 2011 email: royaldutchshellplc.com/2011/03/05/will-shell-block-internet-publication-of-its-nazi-past. If you have access to the ebook, Chapter 22 provides additional context on Donovan’s “unique connection with Shell,” including these interactions.

Extract full 2011 Brandjes email

The full text of the March 3, 2011, email from Michiel Brandjes (then Company Secretary and General Counsel Corporate of Royal Dutch Shell plc) to John Donovan, as published by Donovan on his website royaldutchshellplc.com in the article “Will Shell block Internet publication of its Nazi past?” (dated March 5, 2011), is as follows:
Date: 3 March 2011 09:02:21 GMT
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: A HISTORY OF ROYAL DUTCH SHELL
Dear Mr Donovan, Thank you for your message. Except for this message the company does not wish to respond to you other than to convey that it strongly disagrees with your views and allegations, objects to your actions and reserves its legal rights, including with respect to copyrights. On an exceptional basis we tested your views about history with the relevant historians. They convincingly refute with evidence what you claim in contradiction with A History of Royal Dutch Shell. Best Regards,
Michiel Brandjes
Company Secretary and General Counsel Corporate
Royal Dutch Shell plc
This email was Shell’s response to Donovan’s prior message (dated March 2, 2011) where he invited corrections to his planned publication of extracts from Shell’s official 2007 history book regarding Nazi-era connections. Donovan published the full correspondence (including his own emails) on the site for transparency, framing Brandjes’ reply as a veiled threat of legal action (e.g., copyright claims) to deter posting content on Shell’s alleged Nazi links. Shell took no further action, and Donovan proceeded with publications unchanged.
The same email text appears referenced across Donovan’s related sites (e.g., shellnazihistory.com in Chapter 22 discussions) and in later recaps, with no variations noted. For the original context and full thread (including Donovan’s preceding emails), see: https://royaldutchshellplc.com/2011/03/05/will-shell-block-internet-publication-of-its-nazi-past/. As of February 7, 2026, this remains the primary public source, with no mainstream media corroboration or independent reproductions of the email found.
This website and sisters royaldutchshellgroup.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, shellnews.net, and shellwikipedia.com, are owned by John Donovan - more information here. There is also a Wikipedia segment.

Comments are closed.