The Cracker That Was Promised: Energy Dominance, Plastic Pellets and the Art of the Deal That Wasn’t

By John Donovan

---

DISCLAIMER

This article is satire and commentary. It references real events, including President Donald Trump’s 2019 speech at Shell’s Pennsylvania petrochemical complex, subsequent cost overruns, environmental violations and fines, operational challenges, and later strategic review discussions concerning the asset. It is not financial advice. Readers should consult primary reporting and regulatory filings for detailed factual information.

---

In 2019, beneath cathedral-high steel and the comforting perfume of hydrocarbons, Donald Trump stood before Shell’s Pennsylvania ethane cracker plant and essentially declared it the eighth wonder of the industrial world.

Not a plant.

A prophecy.

This was not just petrochemistry.

This was Energy Dominance™ — bold, capitalised, and preferably chanted by several hundred men in high-visibility jackets.

Shell had invested billions.

America had deregulated enthusiastically.

Appalachian shale gas had been summoned from ancient rock like a patriotic genie.

And there it stood: a monument to polyethylene and political optimism.

---

The Gospel According to Ethane

The story was simple enough to fit on a bumper sticker:

• Frack gas.

• Crack ethane.

• Make plastic.

• Win the future.

The plant — first floated in 2012, sanctioned in 2016 — was projected at roughly $6 billion.

By the time the steel cooled, the number had drifted closer to $10 billion.

But what is $4 billion between friends?

In Washington terms, that’s rounding error.

In petrochemical terms, that’s Tuesday.

---

When Energy Dominance Meets Thermodynamics

Operations began in late 2022.

Then physics entered the chat.

Pennsylvania regulators issued multiple notices of violation related to excess emissions events, flaring incidents and operational problems during start-up.

Shell paid millions in penalties and described the issues as part of the complexity of commissioning a world-scale facility.

Environmental groups described it as something closer to a real-time air-quality experiment.

The Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection described it in paperwork.

The plant did not explode.

It did not collapse.

It did, however, emit more than just patriotic symbolism.

---

The Market, Unfortunately, Did Not Attend the Rally

Here’s where the absurdity ripens.

The plant’s economics relied on favourable spreads between cheap shale ethane and global polyethylene demand.

But global petrochemical markets softened.

Margins narrowed.

Capacity worldwide expanded.

Plastic, tragically, does not salute.

By 2024–2025, Shell was publicly emphasising “capital discipline” and “portfolio optimisation.” Industry reporting suggested the Pennsylvania complex — once the jewel of Appalachian ambition — was under strategic review.

Translation: even the greatest cracker plant in history must justify itself to Excel.

---

And Now… The Ultimate State of the Union (Absurdist Reconstruction)

(House chamber. Flags. Applause so loud it could power a compressor station.)

“My fellow Americans,

We built a plant so beautiful, so incredible, so petrochemical, that people said it defied science.

We cracked ethane like nobody has ever cracked ethane before. The best cracking. Historic cracking.

I gave them the greatest energy climate in the history of climates. We deregulated so much that regulations were actually afraid.

And what happened?

Suddenly I hear — maybe it’s fake news — but I hear it went over budget. Billions more. I said, how do you go billions over? I don’t go billions over. I close deals under.

Then the regulators — very unhappy people — start talking about emissions. Emissions! Nobody talks about the emissions from windmills. Nobody.

And now they’re saying — and this hurts me — they might even consider selling it.

Selling it!

After we gave them Energy Dominance. After we gave them shale so cheap it practically waved a flag.

Let me be clear:

If the greatest cracker plant in history is not cracking greatly enough — that’s not America’s fault.

That’s management.”

(Camera cuts to refinery flare stack spelling “MARGIN CALL” in smoke.)

---

The Theatre vs. The Spreadsheet

The Pennsylvania complex was not a fantasy.

It was built.

It operates.

It produces polyethylene.

It also:

• Cost more than expected.

• Faced documented air-quality violations and fines.

• Entered service during volatile petrochemical market conditions.

• Became subject to strategic scrutiny amid Shell’s broader capital reallocation.

None of this is illegal.

None of this is unprecedented.

All of it is profoundly less cinematic than a rally.

---

The Real Absurdity

The absurdity is not that the plant had problems.

The absurdity is that it was ever framed as destiny.

Energy dominance makes a fine chant.

But polyethylene margins answer only to supply, demand and Chinese export volumes.

The plant was presented as resurrection.

It turned out to be infrastructure.

Which is far less romantic.

---

Final Scene

Imagine it:

The rally lights dim.

The steel towers remain.

The spreadsheets glow.

Somewhere inside a Shell strategy meeting, someone utters the phrase “portfolio optimisation.”

And in the distance, faintly, you can still hear it:

“The greatest cracker plant in the history of cracker plants.”

Reality, as ever, declines to applaud.

This website and sisters royaldutchshellgroup.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, shellnews.net, and shellwikipedia.com, are owned by John Donovan - more information here. There is also a Wikipedia segment.