By Shell News Article Generator | December 10, 2025
“They cried foul — then got shown the gas.”
🔥 The Setup: Shell’s Lost Bet on LNG Virtue Signals
Remember a few months ago when Shell stomped into arbitration claiming that Venture Global had sold off long‑term liquefied natural gas (LNG) cargoes to the spot market — during a price surge after geopolitical mayhem — instead of fulfilling existing contracts? Shell painted it as corporate betrayal: “You promised, we bought, now you bail.” The oily tears were earmarked to flow through courtrooms.
But in August 2025, the tribunal — perhaps smelling the smell of desperation — sided with Venture Global. The verdict? “No fraud found.” Shell’s complaint was parked on the curb, orphaned and gas‑stained.
🧾 The Rebuttal: Venture Global Writes Back — with Sauce
Now Venture Global has filed a formal response in the New York Supreme Court (yes, that’s a thing when energy companies get dramatic), rejecting Shell’s renewed allegations of fraud and procedural mischief.
Their key points:
No documented evidence — claims of some shady communications or ghost‑witness testimony? Nothing to show. The “third‑party” source Shell cited reportedly didn’t even testify to written communications with Venture Global.
Breached confidentiality — according to Venture Global, Shell leaked arbitration‑confidential material to counterparties and their lawyers. That’s right: the victim of an arbitration loss accusing the ex‑claimant of procedural malpractice. Bold.
Shell internally winked at resolution — irony alert: one of Shell’s own executives reportedly emailed Venture Global the same day Shell filed its challenge, saying they were “still open to a commercial resolution.” That’s the corporate equivalent of trash‑talking then sliding into DMs.
📉 Market Reality — The Only Verdict That Matters to Shareholders
Meanwhile, the markets haven’t been kind to the LNG upstart. Since Shell went nuclear with its challenge, Venture Global’s shares plunged roughly 22%, dragging valuations toward record lows.
Looks like the only thing more slippery than LNG itself is investor confidence when courts and contracts get involved.
🎭 What This Saga Really Reveals: Gas‑Giggles in the Boardroom
This isn’t just a legal spat — it’s classic gas‑industry theatrics: boil the drama, serve hot, then bury it in paperwork. Profit margins may fluctuate — but drama? Always contracts.
Shell’s comeback smells less like justice, more like secondhand embarrassment. When your contractual muscle fades, pull out the “we got wronged” card — even if your own internal emails admit you might settle.
In the end, actual market reaction hit harder than any arbitration tribunal: investors make clearer judgments than judges (and they demand real gas, not legal gaslighting).
This website and sisters royaldutchshellgroup.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, shellnews.net, and shellwikipedia.com, are owned by John Donovan. There is also a Wikipedia segment.
EBOOK TITLE: “SIR HENRI DETERDING AND THE NAZI HISTORY OF ROYAL DUTCH SHELL” – AVAILABLE ON AMAZON
EBOOK TITLE: “JOHN DONOVAN, SHELL’S NIGHTMARE: MY EPIC FEUD WITH THE UNSCRUPULOUS OIL GIANT ROYAL DUTCH SHELL” – AVAILABLE ON AMAZON.
EBOOK TITLE: “TOXIC FACTS ABOUT SHELL REMOVED FROM WIKIPEDIA: HOW SHELL BECAME THE MOST HATED BRAND IN THE WORLD” – AVAILABLE ON AMAZON.
