Royal Dutch Shell plc .com Rotating Header Image

Posts Tagged ‘John Hofmeister’

INSPECTOR GENERAL REPORT ON GALE NORTON, SHELL SCANDAL

By John Donovan

Although their names have been redacted, it appears from this report that John Hofmeister and Malcolm Brinded were both directly involved in negotiations/discussions with Gale Norton?

If the issue of Shell corruption is raised, based on our knowledge, there is always a good chance that Mr Big Brain, No Scruples  Brinded will be involved e.g. the “Touch F*** All” safety culture on North Sea Oil Rigs, his backing for a rigged Shell contract tender and now his interesting meeting in London with Gale Norton.

The Office of Inspector General approached me on this particular matter and at their request I supplied Shell internal documents for use in the investigation.  It was at about this time that Shell Oil recruited the services of a specialist unit partly staffed and funded by the FBI to try to cut off the flow of insider information and Shell internal emails etc from reaching me.

Ironic that while we were supplying one U.S. investigative agency with Shell insider information and documents at their request, another was brought in by Shell security to try to plug the leaks. They were unsuccessful.

INSPECTOR GENERAL REPORT ON GALE NORTON, SHELL SCANDAL – PART 1

INSPECTOR GENERAL REPORT ON GALE NORTON, SHELL SCANDAL – PART 2

INSPECTOR GENERAL REPORT ON GALE NORTON, SHELL SCANDAL – PART 3

Shell Nigerian Exploration and Production Co. Ltd. to pay $30 million criminal fine

Posted on Shell Blog by “old nigeria hand” on Sunday Nov 14th, 2010 at 11:26 pm

RESPONSE TO: What did Shell Oil President John Hofmeister know about corruption in Nigeria?

Panalpina and Hofmeister, bribes in Nigeria. I am certain that the top management knew all about the goings on. About 5 years ago a scandal nearly erupted but was quenched. (Or as the say in Nigeria: ‘de disting was quench-oh by de Oga’.

SPDC had made around 500 million dollars disappear over the years to all kind of community projects. No trails could be found in the books. And this for a company that should be able to trace every dollar spent anywhere. Because it is shareholder’s or taxpayer’s money. So I am sure that Hofmeister et all just assumed the bribes via Panalpina would disappear in the great wash. I am not an accountant. But as an engineer I know we can and must and do certify for instance every weld on long pipelines. The exact location, date of weld, weldingrods used, name of welder, and an X-ray photo is included. If you can do that, you should be able to trace every dollar spent? Unless you don’t want to?!?

Related MSNBC Article


Big oil company Royal Dutch Shell of Britain and the Netherlands, along with an exploration subsidiary, agreed to relinquish about $18 million in profits and interest. In addition, Shell Nigerian Exploration and Production Co. Ltd. will pay a $30 million criminal fine.

By MARCY GORDON
The Associated Press

updated 11/4/2010 11:00:51 PM ET

Royal Dutch Shell, others pay $236M in bribe cases

WASHINGTON — Seven companies — Royal Dutch Shell PLC, a big Swiss freight company, four oil service companies and a U.S. shipping firm — have agreed to pay $236.5 million to settle criminal and civil charges that they bribed foreign officials, the government announced Thursday.

The companies were accused of paying customs officials in a dozen countries millions of dollars in exchange for favorable treatment in customs duties, imports and taxes. In addition, they allegedly also paid bribes to get phony documents enabling oil drilling rigs to be brought in to countries.

The companies agreed to pay $156.5 million in criminal fines to settle proceedings with the Justice Department, and about $80 million in civil fines and restitution to settle related charges brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

SEC officials said the agency’s cases constituted its first “sweep” of a specific industry sector to crack down on public companies and third parties that are paying bribes abroad.

Big oil company Royal Dutch Shell of Britain and the Netherlands, along with an exploration subsidiary, agreed to relinquish about $18 million in profits and interest. In addition, Shell Nigerian Exploration and Production Co. Ltd. will pay a $30 million criminal fine.

In court documents filed in Houston, Panalpina World Transport (Holding) Ltd., of Basel, Switzerland, and its U.S. subsidiary agreed to criminal fines of almost $70.6 million. The company also will give up $11.3 million in profits to settle with the SEC. Panalpina acknowledged paying $27 million in bribes from 2002 to 2007 to officials of Angola, Azerbaijan, Brazil, Kazakhstan, Nigeria, Russia and Turkmenistan.

The oil service companies are Houston-based Pride International Inc., Swiss firm Noble Corp., and Transocean Inc. and GlobalSantaFe Corp., both based in the Cayman Islands. The shipping firm is New Orleans-based Tidewater Inc.

The other countries involved were said to be India, Gabon, Equatorial Guinea, Mexico and Venezuela.

The settlements marked the latest action in the government’s efforts to combat overseas corruption in international business. The bribery charges were brought under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, which makes it unlawful to bribe foreign government officials or company executives to secure or retain business. A number of U.S. and foreign companies have been charged with violating the law in recent years.

“Bribing customs officials is not only illegal but also bad for business, as the coordinated efforts of law enforcement increase the risk of detection every day,” SEC Enforcement Director Robert Khuzami said in a statement. “These companies resorted to lucrative arrangements behind the scenes to obtain phony paperwork and special favors, and they landed themselves squarely in investigators’ crosshairs.”

Also in the new settlements:

—Pride International agreed to pay about $23.5 million in restitution; the company and its Pride Forasol subsidiary are paying a $32.6 million criminal fine.

—Tidewater: around $8 million in restitution and a $217,000 civil fine. Subsidiary Tidewater Marine International: a $7.3 million criminal fine.

—Transocean: about $7.3 million in restitution. Transocean Inc. and Transocean Ltd.: a $13.4 million criminal fine.

—GlobalSantaFe: about $3.7 million in restitution and a $2.1 million civil fine.

—Noble: about $5.6 million in restitution and a $2.6 million criminal fine.

Copyright 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.

What did Shell Oil President John Hofmeister know about corruption in Nigeria?

By a former employee of Shell Oil USA

The Panalpina investigation began in 2007. The investigation covers the time period of 2002 -2007. That means, of course, that Shell’s transgressions occurred during John Hofmeister’s term of service at Shell. One has to wonder what his involvement in the bribery schemes were. I am certain that he was fully aware of what was going on, given that he was President of Shell USA from 2005 -2008. Someone had to ‘sign for’ and approve the millions of dollars used for that purpose.

It does seem that Mr. Hofmeister, and other senior management at Shell USA, may not have much regard for the law. Espionage and bribery? Is anyone really surprised by such revelations?

Ah, the contemptuous arrogance of Shell management, and big oil in general. You gotta’ love those guys. They think the law was meant for, as one of BP’s executives recently said, ‘the little people’.

Royal Dutch Shell Panalpina Nigerian Corruption Scandal

John Hofmeister and alleged Shell espionage in the USA

Comment by a former employee of Shell Oil USA

John,

I have a comment about the comment for your ‘retiree’: He got his biology wrong. Toads are not slimy and do not turn into princess. Only frogs are slimy and Hofmeister has that personality trait in abundance.

I also have another observation for your readers about ‘Mr. Toad’:

With regard to your comments/observations about John Hofmeister: It is almost a certainty that Mr. Hofmeister (the alleged ‘pompous toad’) has initimate knowledge of Shell USA’s  (alleged) espionage plan that targeted their former employee’s IP and WMD technologies classified by the US Dept.’s of Defense and Energy, as well as current legal liabilities in that regard. Mr.Hofmeister’s term at Shell (1997 -2008) puts him at Shell during the time of Shell’s concerted effort to gain access to the classified material. It is also very possible that he was intimately involved in the decision/authorization process that led Shell to proceed ahead with, and/or continue with, that (alleged) illegal effort (if he was not directly responsible for any of the decisions or authorizations himself).

So, Mr.Hofmiester’s (the alleged ‘pompous toad’) conduct as a senior level Shell manager may not only have been devious, but very criminal as well. Somebody at Shell was responsible for the decision/authorization process, and only senior level Shell USA management had that authority. Time will tell what his involvement may have been. Who knows, Mr. Hofmeister may be a very willing accessory to a conspiracy to commit espionage. Something to think about.

U.S. DEFENSE DEPT CONFIRMS ESPIONAGE INVESTIGATION OF SHELL

ENDS

(IF MR HOFMEISTER WISHES TO COMMENT ON THIS OR ANY OTHER POSTING ABOUT HIM ON THIS WEBSITE, WE WILL PUBLISH HIS COMMENTS ON AN UNEDITED BASIS)

Former Shell Oil President John Hofmeister pompous as ever

Posted on Shell Blog by “retired shellee” on Nov 10th, 2010 at 11:24 am

Hofmeister pompous as ever.

Last night I watched the BBC documentary on the Macondo blow-out. It was easy to relate with all that was said by the various participants. But two things stuck to my mind: the media and politicians (Obama included and leading the way) are like a troup of rabid dogs. The moment someone is down, they all attack in a feeding frenzy. All with hidden agendas, all completely oblivious of what their actions might cause. Presumably this is their job and I expect hardly anything else from these charlatans.

But then I saw several times that smug toad Hofmeister dumping on BP in general and Hayward in particular. I have seen this devious american arrive in Shell. He was instrumental in pushing the salaries and bonusses of the top echelons to excessive heights, he introduced the ‘behavioural skills’ at the expense of engineering skills, he pulled in many americans that have generally made a mess of things and when he finally was removed, sorry transferred, he travelled as an emperor through the whole of the USA. All under the title of ‘President’. A non-job if ever there was one. He is a disgrace to the people where he came from (Amish). And now he has become an ugly toad kicking someone who is down on the ground. This shows his real character.

I advise all girls NOT to kiss this toad in the hope a handsome prince would emerge. You never know, pigs might fly too.

Shell’s ex-president presses on

During an appearance on CNBC early in the summer, John Hofmeister made a startling statement: “Oil isn’t a free market.” Soon after he said it, the show cut to a commercial and someone handed Hofmeister, who was about to retire as president of Shell Oil Co., a piece of paper. It was a message from Shell’s headquarters in the Netherlands telling him he could not say that.

Click to continue reading “Shell’s ex-president presses on”

Former Shell president is the man with a plan

Everyone these days, from T. Boone Pickens to me, seems to have an energy plan, and Hofmeister is no different. His, though, has executive suite cred. He doesn’t have an interest in any particular fuel source, as Pickens does, and, as he’s quick to point out, he’s not running for office.

Click to continue reading “Former Shell president is the man with a plan”

The Same Old Song on High Gas Prices

Ms. Wasserman Schultz, Democrat of Florida, channeled the rage of every parent in America who has pulled into a gas station recently on the way to ballet lessons or soccer practice, letting loose on the men from Exxon Mobil, Shell, Chevron, ConocoPhillips andBP America.

Click to continue reading “The Same Old Song on High Gas Prices”

Over a barrel: industry players predict future price movements

His latest prediction is for prices to hit $200 per barrel within two years because supplies will be unable to meet soaring global demand.

Click to continue reading “Over a barrel: industry players predict future price movements”

Oil companies ask Congress to allow more US exploration, reduce supply

John Hofmeister, president of Shell Oil, said his company and others are prohibited from exploring for more energy resources in the majority of US lands and offshore, and prohibited from even analyzing potential resources in several areas. ‘The cumulative effect of these policies has been to discourage US investment and send US companies outside the United States to produce new supplies,’ Hofmeister said. ‘As a result, US production has declined so much that nearly 60 percent of daily consumption comes from foreign sources.’

Click to continue reading “Oil companies ask Congress to allow more US exploration, reduce supply”