Royal Dutch Shell Plc  .com Rotating Header Image Shell cuts earnings $285m Shell cuts earnings $285m

By Bruce Stanley in London
May 31, 2004

ROYAL Dutch/Shell Group has reduced its annual earnings by $US203 million ($285 million).

This was revealed in an annual report delayed by two months due to the scandal arising from the company’s downgrading of its oil and gas reserves. Yet even as it sought to restore its battered reputation, Shell suffered another blow when a US refinery said it had supplied Shell stations in the US state of Florida with petrol that contained potentially damaging amounts of sulphur.

Shell’s revised net income for 2003 was $US12.50 billion compared to the original net income figure of $US12.70 billion that it announced in February, before the full extent of its reserves problems emerged.

The company’s restated earnings were 27 per cent higher than the $US9.72 billion in restated net income for 2002. Shell had earlier reported its 2002 net income as $US9.42 billion.

Restated sales totalled $US268.9 billion, up from $US222.8 billion in restated sales for the previous year. By comparison, Shell’s original sales figures in February were $US269 billion for 2003 versus $US223 billion for 2002. Shell also restated its results for 2001.

The catalyst for these embarrassing revisions was four separate reclassifications of its oil and gas reserves, the most recent of which Shell announced last Monday.

The Anglo-Dutch company first stunned shareholders in January when it downgraded 20 per cent, or 3.9 billion barrels, of its reserves from “proven” to less certain categories. Three other downgrades followed, for a total reduction in reserves of 23 per cent, or 4.47 billion barrels, from previously reported levels.

Reserves are an oil company’s most valuable asset, and any reduction in their estimated size is a serious concern for investors.

In the confusion that followed, Shell dismissed several top executives and delayed by two months the release of its annual report. “Rebuilding credibility” and “regaining trust” are now the company’s key priorities, it says in its annual report.

Shell seeks in its annual report to reassure shareholders that its core businesses – exploration and production, and refining and marketing – are in good shape and that it is pursuing several new projects that augured well for the future.

“Shell remains a sound and profitable business, and I firmly believe that we have real strengths on which to grow our business, and rebuild our reputation,” its chairman, Jeroen van der Veer says.

But in another setback, a refinery in Houston has asked the Shell gas stations that it supplies to stop selling regular and mid-grade petrol that was shipped through the Port of Tampa or Broward County’s Port Everglades. Motiva Enterprises said the fuel might contain too much sulphur, which would not affect engine performance but could cause faulty gas gauge readings.

The news came ahead of the Memorial Day weekend, which marks the traditional start of the peak northern summer driving season in the United States.

Shell said none of the senior executives ousted after the furore over oil reserves would receive annual bonuses for 2003.

The company’s annual report showed that former chairman Sir Philip Watts received his annual salary of £865,000 ($2.2 million) last year. But the Shell remuneration committee decided Watts should miss out on an annual bonus – typically worth the same as his yearly pay. It also said he was not entitled to 50 per cent of stock options granted in 2001 as the company had not met performance targets.

Shell’s failure to outperform rivals such as BP and ChevronTexaco also meant Watt missed out on shares worth £1.7 million under the group’s incentive plan.

The reduction in Shell’s reserves led to the resignations of Watts, head of exploration and production Walter van de Vijver, and finance chief Judith Boynton.

Shell published an external investigator’s report last month which revealed dishonesty at the highest levels of the company and showed that some bosses knew for almost two years the company had publicly overstated its reserves.

The company has said it is continuing negotiations with the US Securities and Exchange Commission, which has been investigating its restatements. It is also being pursued by European regulators and may face lawsuits from investors.

Today’s annual reports showed that Van de Vijver was paid £842,000 last year, but he received no bonus for his work in 2003. Boynton was paid her annual salary of £382,000.

The annual reports did not carry details of possible severance payments to the ousted executives. A company spokesman said talks with the individuals were continuing.

Shell also said that none of the present management team, including new chairman Jeroen van der Veer, would receive annual bonuses for 2003.

Shares in Shell Transport & Trading, the group’s British arm, fell 1.1 per cent to close at 394.25 pence on the London Stock Exchange.

The Associated Press

This website and sisters,,,, and, are owned by John Donovan. There is also a Wikipedia segment.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Comment Rules

  • Please show respect to the opinions of others no matter how seemingly far-fetched.
  • Abusive, foul language, and/or divisive comments may be deleted without notice.
  • Each blog member is allowed limited comments, as displayed above the comment box.
  • Comments must be limited to the number of words displayed above the comment box.
  • Please limit one comment after any comment posted per post.

%d bloggers like this: