Royal Dutch Shell Plc  .com Rotating Header Image

U.S. Judge Allows Suit Against Shell to Proceed

THE WALL STREET JOURNAL: U.S. Judge Allows Suit Against Shell to Proceed

“A federal judge has allowed a stock-fraud lawsuit against Royal Dutch Shell PLC to continue, finding that the shareholders had “adequately” shown reason for the court to examine their allegations concerning the company’s restatements of its oil reserves.”

Associated Press
August 16, 2005 5:20 p.m.

NEWARK, N.J. — A federal judge has allowed a stock-fraud lawsuit against Royal Dutch Shell PLC to continue, finding that the shareholders had “adequately” shown reason for the court to examine their allegations concerning the company’s restatements of its oil reserves.

The class-action lawsuit questions whether the company’s statements on its reserves, an important measure of future performance, purposely omitted or twisted important facts.

Shell said Tuesday that it planned to appeal the ruling, questioning whether the court has jurisdiction “over non-U.S. purchasers who bought their securities on non -U.S. markets.” The company is based in the Hague, Netherlands.

Restatements of the reserves last year led to declines in the company’s share price, prompting shareholders to sue the oil company, some executives and its accounting firms, PricewaterhouseCoopers and KPMG. As a result of the ruling, the plaintiffs and defendants are to exchange information, which could include scheduling depositions. The case remains far from being presented to a jury.

The reduced projections also cost Shell, one of the world’s largest oil producers with BP PLC and Exxon Mobil Corp., almost $150 million in fines imposed by U.S. and British regulators and led to the dismissal of three senior executives.

The U.S. Department of Justice has also launched a criminal investigation, according to the opinion by U.S. Chief District John W. Bissell. The judge said that the company’s global footprint doesn’t prevent it from being sued in New Jersey. Plaintiffs filed in the state because Shell has gasoline distribution terminals there.

A lead lawyer for the shareholders, Stanley D. Bernstein, said they were satisfied with the decision, even though it did dismiss several of the original counts against certain defendants.

Shell spokesman Simon Buerk, reached in London, said Tuesday, “The decision reflects a ruling at an early procedural phase of the case that presents the court’s views on the scope of its statutory jurisdiction and the adequacy of plaintiffs’ complaint. The decision does not reflect whether plaintiffs ultimately will be able to prove any of the claims they have alleged.”

The Anglo-Dutch oil company, formally unified last month, resulted from the combination of Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. of the Netherlands, and Shell Transport & Trading Co., of London.

Copyright © 2005 Associated Press

This website and sisters royaldutchshellgroup.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, and shellnews.net, are owned by John Donovan. There is also a Wikipedia segment.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Comment Rules

  • Please show respect to the opinions of others no matter how seemingly far-fetched.
  • Abusive, foul language, and/or divisive comments may be deleted without notice.
  • Each blog member is allowed limited comments, as displayed above the comment box.
  • Comments must be limited to the number of words displayed above the comment box.
  • Please limit one comment after any comment posted per post.