Royal Dutch Shell Plc  .com Rotating Header Image

Sunday Telegraph: BG’s flaky fundamentals: …the most obvious buyer – Shell

Oil companies have had a terrific run over the past three years. But few have done as well as Britain’s BG. Its stock has nearly tripled thanks to the steep rise in energy prices and persistent takeover speculation. But holding out for that bid could entail a very long wait.

To see the problem, look at the most obvious buyer – Shell. Both are big in liquefied natural gas. BG has good short-term production prospects, but needs to boost its longer-term reserves. Shell is the opposite: it has strong long-term prospects but needs to boost its short-term reserves.

BG is valued at around $14 per barrel of reserves. Large oil firms such as Shell have to spend about $15 a barrel to find and develop their own. Shell could buy them more cheaply off the shelf by snapping up BG instead.

The trouble is, the maths don’t work. Even with a relatively slender 20 per cent premium, BG’s takeout price would be £27bn. Cost savings might be 3 per cent of that – comparable to other big oil mergers. Taxed and added to BG’s forecast profits of £1.6bn, Shell would earn about £2bn a year from the acquisition. That would yield a return on investment of 7.7 per cent – barely covering Shell’s cost of capital.

What is more, the premium is likely to be greater. After all, BG is a scarce asset, and companies have sold for more in recent resource sector deals. But at higher levels, BG is really of interest only to trophy buyers.

Despite a 13 per cent drop since April, BG’s shares still trade at almost 14 times earnings – a 44 per cent premium to its peers. That can be justified only by bid speculation.

On fundamentals it looks flaky. BG’s profits are coming under pressure as it cranks up capital expenditure. That will make the multiple look even more stretched.

BG’s shares are worth buying if you think energy prices will rocket, but the risks there are on the downside. Otherwise they look poor value. John Paul Rathbone

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/main.jhtml?xml=/money/2006/09/10/ccbreak10.xml

This website and sisters royaldutchshellgroup.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, and shellnews.net, are owned by John Donovan. There is also a Wikipedia segment.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Comment Rules

  • Please show respect to the opinions of others no matter how seemingly far-fetched.
  • Abusive, foul language, and/or divisive comments may be deleted without notice.
  • Each blog member is allowed limited comments, as displayed above the comment box.
  • Comments must be limited to the number of words displayed above the comment box.
  • Please limit one comment after any comment posted per post.