THE SHELL LEAKS FILES: 7 SEPTEMBER 2026
SLF-2007-050
The Sakhalin Papers XL: The Blue Location — PA-C Moves Offshore, but a Safer Site Is Not a Green Light
Sakhalin Energy’s 2012 South Piltun survey produced exactly the sort of result that independent environmental engagement was supposed to achieve. The work finished earlier than the whale scientists’ deadline. No Health, Safety and Environment incident was reported. The feared shallow-gas problem beneath an alternative platform site was not confirmed. And the proposed PA-C location moved farther offshore — away from the Western Gray Whale feeding area and closer to existing pipelines. But the Western Gray Whale Advisory Panel did not treat those improvements as approval of the third platform. Before any irreversible decision, it wanted a full assessment of critical habitat and cumulative impacts. The survey had made PA-C easier to locate. It had not answered whether PA-C should be built.
Archive reference: SLF-2007-050
Collection: The Sakhalin Papers
Principal primary record: Western Gray Whale Advisory Panel, Report of the Twelfth Meeting, Geneva, 5–7 November 2012
Supporting scientific record: WGWAP Noise Task Force and Western Gray Whale research programme material
Authenticated Shell records: Royal Dutch Shell plc Annual Report and Form 20-F 2012; Royal Dutch Shell plc Sustainability Report 2012
Contemporaneous reporting: AFP/WWF, February 2012
Court record: Export Credits Guarantee Department v Friends of the Earth [2008] EWHC 638 (Admin), used solely for the earlier Sakhalin II financing and environmental-disclosure context
Evidence standard: Statements made by Sakhalin Energy to WGWAP are reported as company representations. WGWAP conclusions are identified as independent scientific advice. “No HSE incident” is not treated as proof that the survey produced no biological response. The “blue location” remained a proposed platform site; PA-C had not received a final investment decision.





























