Clarification: Shell’s 2007 “Donovan Follow Up” Email — Not 40 Named People, But Still a Remarkably Large Circulation
A correction to an earlier estimate, and a closer look at one extraordinary Shell internal email
An earlier article on this website referred to a 40-person Shell counter-measures team dealing with the Donovans.
That number now requires clarification.
The underlying Shell email is entirely genuine. It is dated 9 March 2007 at 15:28, marked “Legally Privileged and Confidential”, and concerns what the surviving subject line identifies as a “Donovan follow up.”
What cannot be established precisely from the released copy is the exact number of people on the email’s circulation list.
Shell redacted the entire “To:” field so heavily that individual recipient names can no longer be counted reliably. The blacked-out address list stretches across roughly seven densely populated lines. A previous AI-assisted assessment appears to have treated the redacted layout as supporting approximately 40 names.
John Donovan prompt: Trying to find any information about any Shell spying activities in Australia?
John Donovan prompt: Your appraisal and outspoken comments, please: https://royaldutchshellplc.com/2026/07/04/bill-campbells-final-case-against-shell-the-brent-bravo-warnings-the-touch-f-all-culture-and-the-alleged-cover-up-that-would-not-die/
One of the world’s largest oil companies spent years trying not to look obsessed with a father-and-son website in Essex, while quietly producing internal briefings, issue notes, legal warnings, media lines, Wikipedia strategies, security chatter, source-hunting discussions and reputation-management scripts about exactly that father-and-son website.
Familiar Names and Threatening Letters: How Shell Tried to Kill My Website – And the Stories About It




Bravo, Shell! Your daredevil attitude towards safety is truly awe-inspiring.























