Royal Dutch Shell Plc  .com Rotating Header Image

False Advertising Class Action Against Shell Oil

Screen Shot 2014-10-30 at 09.22.43The United States District Court for the District of Oregon recently denied a motion to dismiss a putative nationwide class action brought against Shell Oil for alleged breach of contract, false advertising and an array of state consumer protection allegations.

Article by David O. Klein of Klein Moynihan Turco LLP  published by mondaq: 8 December 2014

False Advertising Class Action Against Shell Oil Fueled By Federal Court

The United States District Court for the District of Oregon recently denied a motion to dismiss a putative nationwide class action brought against Shell Oil for alleged breach of contract, false advertising and an array of state consumer protection allegations.

In the action captioned Kearney v. Equilon Enterprises, LLC d/b/a Shell Oil Products US, 14CV254, Shell Oil moved to dismiss the putative class action complaint. While the court dismissed several state law statutory claims, the court refused to dismiss plaintiffs’ nationwide breach of contract claim.

The Shell Oil Advertisement: A Contract with Consumers?

Specifically, the advertisement at issue in the action was part of Shell’s “Ski Free” promotion and, according to Plaintiffs, promised: “Buy 10 gallons of fuel, get a voucher for a free lift ticket.” In reality, once Plaintiffs purchased ten gallons of fuel, they received a “two for one” coupon that allowed applicable consumers the right to obtain a free lift ticket only after purchasing a lift ticket at full price at a participating ski resort.

The only advertisement that the Plaintiffs saw was a sign promising a free ski lift ticket if they purchased ten gallons of fuel. The Court held that the “clear offer in the advertisement established a unilateral contract, and Plaintiffs accepted the offer through performance by purchasing ten gallons of fuel at a Shell station participating in the ‘Ski Free’ promotion.” From the clear language of the advertisement, the Court held that it was reasonable for a consumer to believe that if he or she purchased ten gallons of fuel at a participating Shell gas station, he or she would get a free lift ticket. Therefore, the Court denied Shell’s motion to dismiss the breach of contract cause of action and allowed the false advertising class action to proceed.

The Importance of Truth in Advertising

The Federal Trade Commission and the plaintiffs’ class action bar closely scrutinize the truth (or deceptiveness) of all types of advertising and marketing materials. Large settlements and court judgments have been entered against advertisers and retailers that fail to follow applicable state and federal advertising rules and regulations. As such, it is critical for marketers to secure seasoned advertising counsel in connection with prospective marketing campaigns or risk facing a false advertising investigation or lawsuit.

SOURCE ARTICLE WITH CONTACT INFORMATION

This website and sisters royaldutchshellgroup.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, and shellnews.net, are owned by John Donovan. There is also a Wikipedia segment.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Comment Rules

  • Please show respect to the opinions of others no matter how seemingly far-fetched.
  • Abusive, foul language, and/or divisive comments may be deleted without notice.
  • Each blog member is allowed limited comments, as displayed above the comment box.
  • Comments must be limited to the number of words displayed above the comment box.
  • Please limit one comment after any comment posted per post.