
Positive omens combine for courtship of Imperial Energy

Independent news, investigations and information about Shell plc, with free access to our extensive, continuously updated historical archive spanning decades.

Imperial Energys prospects look much brighter than they did in the spring, when it was forced to mount a rights issue to fund further development after failing to secure debt finance in the contracting financial markets.
Now the Russia-focused oil business is being courted by two suitors keen to get their hands on its expanding operations. The Oil and Natural Gas Corporation (ONGC), an Indian group, moved on Imperial last month and now China has entered the fray with an approach by the state-owned Sinopec. There is also speculation that a third bidder may emerge in the shape of Knoc, South Koreas nationally owned oil company.
A competition should drive the price of the shares up. At £11.60, they are below the £12.90 cash offer from ONGC. Imperial should be able to capitalise on its sudden wave of interest to command a decent price. Cazenove is predicting a kill zone of about £13-£14; Daniel Stewart has a target of £15.
Yet analysts are not discounting the possibility of India and China working together on an offer. The two countries have some experience of cooperation for oil and could chose this route to avoid a costly bid battle.
But before we get carried away, there is the Russian Government to consider if the successful bidder is not Russian. Notwithstanding the problems at TNK-BP, analysts are not anticipating problems. Sinopec already has interests in the Sakhalin III oil prospect and ONGC in Sakhalin I. It is thought that the Chinese company sounded out the Russian authorities before making the bid. Additionally, there is speculation that Rosneft, the giant Russian oil producer and partner of Sinopec and ONGC in their Sakhalin ventures, would take a stake in the new Imperial business if it was sold, which would smooth the passage of any deal.
Neither of the bids is yet certain, but neither looks speculative, either. Moreover, both suitors have the resources. ONGC has a market capitalisation of $50 billion (£25.5 billion), compared with the £1.3 billion that it has bid for Imperial, and Sinopec effectively has the resources of the Chinese Government.
Imperials shares have taken their fair share of knocks over the past year. The business failed to sell a stake to Gazprom and clashed with the Russian authorities over environmental concerns. The British group was accused of overstating its reserves to boost its share price, provoking fears that it could face the same renationalisation moves as Shells natural gas venture in Sakhalin and BPs Kovykta programme. Yet progress has been made since that scare and Imperial has been able to register reserves more successfully.
The company is also expanding rapidly, has large reserves for the size of its business and is developing key infrastructure in Siberia. In short, it has much going for it. Buy.
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/markets/article4460862.ece
Posted in: Gas, Oil, Russia, The Times.
Tagged: BP · China · Gas · Oil · ONGC · Sakhalin · Siberia · TNK-BP
Sir Henri Deterding, the controversial and outspoken founder of Royal Dutch Shell, now haunts the website. Wise to all the knowledge of Shell, and its shellanigans, he delivers informative and satirical insight to anything about Shell. He's a grumpy old sod, so you'll have to excuse his bluntness.
Click the big chat-bubble (bottom-right of the website) to ask Sir Henri a question. Enjoy!





The worst ever
I used shell broadband. It was by far the worst broadband provider ever! The internet did not work most days. I had their super fast broadband and it dropped out constantly. Watching a movie was awful with the constant buffering. Customer support was super slow. Now their going to charge me for the useless router which I have sent back.
Date of experience: 21 November 2023
The worst ever
I used shell broadband. It was by far the worst broadband provider ever! The internet did not work most days. I had their super fast broadband and it dropped out constantly. Watching a movie was awful with the constant buffering. Customer support was super slow. Now their going to charge me for the useless router which I have sent back.
Date of experience: 21 November 2023
Broadband Service is Appalling
I ordered shell energy broadband on nov 2. I was promised connection the following week. They initiated the direct debit. I called the following week and was told router would arrive on 13 and service would go live on 17. No further email or communication until 20 when I was told service would start on 30th. Spent 10 minutes waiting on phone line and spoke to a polite assistant who was absolutely useless in solving my problem. Avoid this unprofessional and chaotic… Read more
30 November 2023: Posted by John Donovan
The content below is sourced from current verifiable customer reviews of Shell Energy published on Trustpilot.
Extremely slow broadband for 10 months, not fixed. I have had slow broadband well below the guaranteed speed for 10 months and Shell Energy have not been able to fix it. They have tried sending about 4 or 5 engineers but have not fixed the problem. Gurps, who I have been dealing with most recently, has been friendly and polite, alth… Read more

See our link list of over 500 articles by the FT, Wall Street Journal, Reuters, Bloomberg, Forbes, Dow Jones Newswires, New York Times, CNBC etc, plus UK House of Commons Select Committee Hansard records, information on U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission website etc. all containing references to our Shell focussed websites, or our website founders Alfred and John Donovan. Includes TV documentary features in English and German, newspaper and magazine articles, radio interviews, newsletters etc. Plus academic papers, Stratfor intelligence reports and UK, U.S. and Australian state/parliamentary publications, also citing our Shell websites. Click on this link to see the entire list, all in date order with a link to an index of over 100 books also containing references to our non-profit websites and/or our activities.

John Donovan, the website owner


This is not a Shell website. The nature of this platform should be evident from the content presented here and on our related Shell-focused websites, including shellnazihistory.com. For more details, please refer to the Disclaimer link at the top of this page. Shell does not endorse or approve of this website.
Our platform operates as a non-commercial, advert-free, and subscription-free space. We do not solicit or accept donations and aim to provide information to our readers free of charge. The Shell logo image with white text used on this website is in the public domain due to expired copyright and anonymous authorship. It can be found on WIKIMEDIA COMMONS. Use this link for Shell’s own website.
Our content, including images and features like the Sheldon chatbot, incorporates information generated by Artificial Intelligence (AI) and various other technological means. We may also draw from sources such as Wikipedia and other published materials. Please note that some content may include satirical adaptations or elements of gossip, rumors, or exaggeration to engage and entertain our audience.
We strive to maintain factual accuracy and encourage readers to notify us promptly if any factual inaccuracies are found, so we can address and rectify them swiftly. Readers are advised to verify all information independently for accuracy and completeness. Any actions taken based on the content provided on our platform are at your own risk.


© 2026 Royal Dutch Shell Plc .com | Powered by WordPress
A WordPress theme by Ravi Varma