Royal Dutch Shell Plc  .com Rotating Header Image

The U.S. law firm gaining a reputation for successfully suing the oil giant Shell

By John Donovan

Printed below is a Google Review of the employment attorney law firm Oberti Sullivan LLP fast gaining a reputation for successfully suing the unscrupulous oil giant Shell, multiple times.

It was posted by Michael Oliveri, the former senior U.S. military officer who sued Shell for age discrimination and retaliation after the energy giant revoked his job offer. His posting seems to confirm, as previously stated online, that Shell settled his claim. 


Mark Oberti and Ed Sullivan are two fine attorneys. They recently represented me in an age discrimination case, taking on one of Houston’s oil giants. They brilliantly went toe to toe with their company’s battery of attorneys. Mark and Ed continuously provided their insight, guidance, and represented me vigorously. They quickly understood the nuances of my case and developed a winning strategy. They were always open, honest, and straight forward. If you’re seeking legal representation, Mark and Ed are your guys.

The same law firm has sued Shell several times on behalf of individuals, all making allegations against the boss of Shell global security James W.D. Hall (a British spook). They have represented Crockett Oaks III (former FBI agent), Michael Oliveri and Walied Shater (a former U.S. Secret Service Agent) and appear to be on a winning streak.

I invite Shell to contact me if, in fact, Shell did not settle the relevant claims for pots of money and I will happily publish a correction.

Today, we have news that Oberti Sullivan is representing Julia Shur, an employee of Shell who was diagnosed with Stage 4 colon cancer in June 2019. A year later, she was terminated for alleged performance reasons despite having led two transactions that resulted in more than $160 million in revenue for Shell that year.

Shell Terminated Executive After Stage 4 Cancer Diagnosis

A related Houston Chronicle Article

Hiring dispute brings second lawsuit against Shell

Photo of L.M. Sixel

Earlier this year Crockett Oaks III sued Shell for allegedly firing him after he objected to hiring preferences based on age and gender. Oaks and a selecition committee chose a 53-year-old man with a military background for a security advisor opening, but Shell executives allegedly blocked his hiring and directed Oaks to find a young, female candidate instead, according to court documents.

The case was settled —no details are available in the federal court records —but the man Oaks sought to hire sued Shell in June for age discrimination and retaliation after the energy giant revoked his job offer.

Michael G. Oliveri was offered —and accepted —the security advisor job in October 2016, according to Oliveri’s lawsuit filed recently in federal court in Houston. Oliveri, who was working for a contractor for Shell at the time, received a Shell employee number and a start date, which was ultimately delayed.

Two months later, Shell revoked Oliveri’s offer for the staff position that paid $114,000-a-year, plus bonus, according to court records.

Oliveri, who figured prominently in Oak’s discrimination charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and subsequent lawsuit against Shell, said in his lawsuit that he became “persona non grata” with the oil company.

Shell would not comment and has not responded to the complaint in court filings. Houston employment lawyer Mark Oberti who represented Oaks and who is now representing Oliveri also declined to comment.

The details of how Oliveri was chosen by a selection committee and how Oaks’ boss in the Netherlands was “frustrated and unhappy” about the recommendation were detailed in Oaks’ lawsuit. So were the executive’s instructions to look for someone younger and female.

“The profile we discussed was ex-government agency, still early in career and (based on previous conversations) you know I would want you to look particularly at female candidates,” according to one email from Oaks’ boss in September, which was cited in Oaks’ complaint.

Oaks said in his lawsuit that he objected to the use of age and gender during a subsequent conference with human resource representatives and later with his boss.

Meanwhile, Shell officials put Oliveri’s job offer on hold. Oliveri said in his lawsuit that he was called to Shell’s office in Houston and quizzed about his military connections to Oaks. Oliveri is a colonel in the U.S. Army Reserves and serves in the same reserve unit as Oaks, a lieutenant colonel.

One month later, on Dec. 6, Oaks was dismissed for failing to disclose that he and Oliveri were part of the same Army Reserve unit. In his lawsuit, however, Oaks said it was a “bogus cover” to fire him.
Oaks and Oliveri did not have a reporting relationship in the military and Oaks said he repeatedly disclosed their military connection to Shell officials.

Three days later, on Dec. 9, Shell revoked Oliveri’s job offer. He was not given a reason, according to his lawsuit, but was told he could re-apply when the position was re-posted. Oliveri reapplied earlier this year, but learned in April that he did not get the job.

The re-posting was a “sham designed to whitewash” age, sex discrimination or both, according to Oliveri’s lawsuit.

Shell also cancelled Oliveri’s $80,000 a year contract job as an event security adviser, effective at the end of the year, according to the lawsuit. Oliveri is seeking the wages he would have earned at Shell, attorney fees and other damages.

Screenshot downloaded 31 March 2022 of Google Reviews about Oberti Sullivan LLP including a review by Michael Oliveri

This website and sisters,,,, and, are owned by John Donovan. There is also a Wikipedia segment.

Comments are closed.

Comment Rules

  • Please show respect to the opinions of others no matter how seemingly far-fetched.
  • Abusive, foul language, and/or divisive comments may be deleted without notice.
  • Each blog member is allowed limited comments, as displayed above the comment box.
  • Comments must be limited to the number of words displayed above the comment box.
  • Please limit one comment after any comment posted per post.