After dabbling in green PR and selling off assets, Shell’s production tanks while Exxon and Chevron pump away. BlackRock yawns.
Oh, Shell. The self-proclaimed champion of “Powering Progress.” The oil giant that flirted with an “energy transition” just long enough to slap wind turbines on its annual report before sprinting right back to its first love: fossil fuels. And yet—somehow—it’s producing less of them than at any point in the last two decades.
Let’s set the stage. In the great oil-and-gas Olympics of Q2, Exxon and Chevron took home gold medals in pure, unapologetic extraction. Exxon pumped 4.6 million barrels of oil equivalent per day, fuelled by Guyana’s deepwater gushers and a little something called the Pioneer Natural Resources acquisition. Chevron cranked out 3.4 million barrels per day, with Kazakhstan, the Gulf of Mexico, and the Permian all coughing up crude like it’s still 1973.
Both saw earnings drop—Exxon’s $7.1 billion was down 15% year-over-year, Chevron’s $2.5 billion nearly halved—but they barely flinched. This is Big Oil. Prices go down? Wait a bit. They’ll be back.
And then there’s Shell.
Shell managed just 2.65 million barrels a day in Q2, a 4.2% drop from last year and—drumroll—the lowest production since the early 2000s. The company blames asset sales and those much-hyped investments in alternative energy sources that, shockingly, didn’t magically replace billions in oil profits. Shell’s experiment in “being less evil” now looks about as effective as a paper umbrella in a hurricane.
Yes, they still beat analysts’ profit forecasts—because Shell is still shovelling billions back to shareholders instead of investing in actual transformation—but operationally? Exxon and Chevron are lapping them.
Reuters’ Ron Bousso points out that European supermajors like BP and Shell need to “catch up” with their American peers in production and earnings. Translation: stop pretending to be green, pump more oil, and maybe—just maybe—BlackRock will pat you on the head again.
Forecasters still predict peak oil and gas demand before the decade is out, but Shell seems ready to gamble that the peak will be postponed long enough to squeeze a few more billion out of what’s left. Because when your green pivot fails, why not go all-in on the thing that’s killing the planet?
Until then, Shell’s strategy is clear:
-
Cut costs.
-
Please shareholders with buybacks and dividends.
-
Avoid mentioning that output is in freefall.
-
Hope no one notices the “energy transition” was just a marketing exercise.
And trust us—BlackRock, one of Shell’s biggest investors, isn’t losing sleep. For them, a “transition” is just a bridge back to the oilfields.
DISCLAIMER: This article is a work of commentary and satire based entirely on publicly available, verifiable information from credible news outlets and official company statements. It is intended for the purpose of criticism, parody, and public interest discussion.
This website and sisters royaldutchshellgroup.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, shellnews.net, and shellwikipedia.com, are owned by John Donovan - more information here. There is also a Wikipedia segment, the Shell DPA Files, "Shell and the Spies", the Shell Leaks files, as well as books written and published by John Donovan - Kindle eBooks. Timeline of the Donovan Shell Feud. Toxic History of Royal Dutch Shell Group. Shell and the Donovans: The Full Media Record — 550+ Articles, 110 Books, 40 Years.
