
Oil giant Shell has rolled out a new thermal management fluid for electric vehicles—yes, you read that right. The same company whose raison d’être once was pumping crude into the ground now says it can accelerate EV charging from 10% to 80% in 10 minutes. Inevitable? Maybe. Credible? Let’s dig in.
The Tech They’re Pushing
Shell’s Lubricants division claims it has developed a “high-performance EV thermal management fluid” that enables faster charging times “without compromise to battery safety, thermal stability or lifespan.” (Source: The Cool Down / New Atlas via The Cool Down)
In their own words:
“Shell has successfully formulated and demonstrated a high-performance EV thermal management fluid with the ability to unlock significant reductions in charging times without compromise to battery safety, thermal stability or lifespan, aiding the widespread adoption of battery electric vehicles.” (quoted in the original article)
The promise: shave precious minutes off charging time—a coveted upgrade for EV owners everywhere.
The Fine Print & Reality Check
-
Ten minutes for 10% → 80% is impressive, but many factors determine charging speed: battery chemistry, ambient temperature, charger power. Shell avoids saying which chargers or under what conditions.
-
Given Shell’s reputation, sceptics are quick to ask: is this fluid a game-changer, or just another proprietary “consumable” requiring the consumer to keep returning to Shell? One commenter put it succinctly:
“It’s probably a consumable … now you’ll need to go to Shell to get your ‘battery gas.’”
-
Moreover, the move comes in the context of Shell’s broader pivot toward low-carbon business lines. The company has long claimed to have an “inevitable transition” stance—since at least 2017, a Shell executive was already talking about the world needing to “act, even more so than before.”
-
More recently, in its 2025 Energy Outlook, Shell has suggested AI will reshape energy demand by enabling more efficient systems across industries.
Thus, this EV fluid initiative fits into existing narratives: Shell wants a foot in EV evolution while keeping one in fossil fuel legacy.
WTF Shell?
This is rich: Shell, one of the planet’s top polluters, is now selling itself as an EV innovator. But does that wash when:
-
Shell’s history is littered with safety scandals, pipeline leaks, regulatory fines, and toxic exposures?
-
Their biggest institutional investors—BlackRock, Vanguard—are pushing ESG compliance and green credibility?
-
Shell’s transition promises remain ambiguous, slow, and often contradictory?
When they tout “reducing charging times,” one has to ask: are they solving a real problem, or creating a new profit center masked as green virtue?
If it’s real, let’s give credit. But let’s not forget—this is the same company that built an empire on oil spills, secret litigation, and regulatory chaff.
Disclaimer
Warning: satire ahead. The criticisms are pointed, the humour intentional, and the facts stubbornly real. Quotes are reproduced word-for-word from trusted sources. As for authorship—John Donovan and AI both claim credit, but the jury’s still out on who was really in charge.
This website and sisters royaldutchshellgroup.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, shellnews.net, and shellwikipedia.com, are owned by John Donovan - more information here. There is also a Wikipedia segment.

EBOOK TITLE: “SIR HENRI DETERDING AND THE NAZI HISTORY OF ROYAL DUTCH SHELL” – AVAILABLE ON AMAZON
EBOOK TITLE: “JOHN DONOVAN, SHELL’S NIGHTMARE: MY EPIC FEUD WITH THE UNSCRUPULOUS OIL GIANT ROYAL DUTCH SHELL” – AVAILABLE ON AMAZON.
EBOOK TITLE: “TOXIC FACTS ABOUT SHELL REMOVED FROM WIKIPEDIA: HOW SHELL BECAME THE MOST HATED BRAND IN THE WORLD” – AVAILABLE ON AMAZON.



















