Big Profits, Bigger Spin

Shell Rakes in Billions, Touts LNG & Trading Gains — Because Cashill isn’t Climate

Big Profits, Bigger Spin

Shell has released a Q3 2025 trading update that reads like a corporate victory lap. According to OilPrice, the company expects its Integrated Gas (LNG + trading/optimization) business to deliver “significantly higher” results compared to Q2. Refining margins are forecast to jump to $11.60 per barrel (from $8.90). Upstream production is guided to 1.79–1.89 million barrels of oil equivalent per day. Meanwhile, LNG liquefaction is expected to rise to 7.0–7.4 million metric tons.

In short: Shell is banking on gas trading + optimized operations to mask weaker parts of the empire.

Signs of market reaction are already visible: shell shares allegedly gained ~2%, bringing YTD share appreciation to ~13%.


The Caveats & Reality Check

$600 million impairment: Shell is also absorbing a non-cash hit tied to scrapping its Rotterdam biofuels project.

Brazil drag: The company expects a $0.2–0.4 billion drag due to adjustments in its interest in Brazil’s Tupi field.

Chemical woes: Refining looks okay, but Chemical margins are expected to decline.

Thus, Shell’s gamble is: let the gas + trading shine shine shine while the other bits limp in the background.


Who’s Watching, Who’s Cheering?

Shell’s biggest institutional shareholders — BlackRock, Vanguard, sovereign wealth funds — have spent recent years pushing ESG and climate accountability. Now, here comes Shell saying: “Gas trading is our future.” That disconnect is glaring. Is this a pivot or a pivot-hold-on-to-fossil lifeline?

And don’t forget: Shell’s past disasters — leaks, safety incidents, environmental liabilities — still loom as financial and reputational risks. Big returns now might vanish if another scandal erupts.


WTF Shell?

Shell is seeking to rebrand itself as a gas-powered optimization behemoth. But here’s the core:

  • You can’t call your fossil fuel business “climate credible” just because you optimized more than last quarter.

  • When you sell a biofuels plant, take impairment losses, and still expect cheers for your Q3 outlook — that’s spin, not transition.

  • Trading and optimization are nice, but full profits depend on markets, volatility, regulation, and luck.

This is not “Powering Progress.” It’s “Profits Over Progress.”

Disclaimer

Warning: satire ahead. The criticisms are pointed, the humour intentional, and the facts stubbornly real. Quotes are reproduced word-for-word from trusted sources. As for authorship, John Donovan and AI both claim credit, but the jury’s still out on who was really in charge.

*This website and sisters royaldutchshellgroup.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, shellnews.net, and shellwikipedia.com, are owned by John Donovan - more information here. There is also a Wikipedia segment, the Shell DPA Files, "Shell and the Spies", the Shell Leaks files, as well as books written and published by John Donovan - Kindle eBooks. Timeline of the Donovan Shell Feud. Toxic History of Royal Dutch Shell Group. Shell and the Donovans: The Full Media Record — 550+ Articles, 110 Books, 40 Years. *All created and supported by internet wizz, Nick Gill.

Comments are closed.