Royal Dutch Shell Plc  .com Rotating Header Image

Shell’s Climate Betrayal: Profits Over Planet Sparks Church of England Revolt

By John Donovan

In an audacious display of corporate arrogance, oil behemoth Shell is embroiled in a showdown with the Church of England (CofE). Accused of reneging on its commitments to a greener future, Shell has drawn the ire of the Church, whose pension board is set to vote against the company’s chief executive, Wael Sawan, and chairman, Sir Andrew MacKenzie, at an upcoming shareholder meeting.

Despite the global urgency to combat climate change, Shell continues to prioritize its short-term profits over the long-term health of the planet. The energy giant, far from being a responsible corporate citizen, has been exploiting the Ukraine crisis to bolster its fossil fuel profits, while shamelessly backpedalling on promises to transition to clean energy.

Adam Matthews, the Church’s chief responsible investment officer, has expressed grave disappointment in Shell’s conduct, stating that the Church has lost faith in the company’s direction. This condemnation from such a significant institution reveals Shell’s blatant disregard for the urgency of the climate crisis.

Even more damning is the evidence of Shell’s greed: a record-breaking annual profit of £32.2bn, a colossal sum that could have been channelled towards renewable energy initiatives. Instead, Shell has chosen to shower its shareholders with £9.5bn, which speaks volumes about its skewed priorities.

Shell’s half-hearted commitment to reduce its own emissions by 50% by 2030 and its claim of already being halfway towards this goal comes across as nothing more than lip service. The Church’s symbolic vote, although representing a minor stake in the company, could spur other investors to hold Shell accountable.

Shell’s obstinacy threatens to undermine the Climate Action 100+ group’s efforts, including the Church, Blackrock, Legal and General, and Aviva. These organizations are pushing major polluters to transition to renewable energy sources, but Shell’s actions suggest it has no genuine interest in such a shift.

Shell’s greenwashing strategy is a far cry from responsible corporate behaviour, and it’s high time this energy giant faced the music for its lackadaisical approach to climate change. Will other investors follow the Church’s lead and demand more from this corporate titan? The world watches as Shell’s corporate drama unfolds.

Shell is invited to point out for correction any factual inaccuracies and supply closing comments for publication as part of this article on an unedited basis. 

This website and sisters,,,, and, are owned by John Donovan. There is also a Wikipedia segment.

Comments are closed.