Shell Games: Champagne Bonuses, Cracked Climates, and the BP Bait-and-Switch

In the latest episode of Oilopoly: Climate Be Damned, Shell—the planet-warming powerhouse formerly known as Royal Dutch, now just royally brazen—is facing a pesky little revolt. No, not from the millions affected by its carbon-spewing empire or the earthquake survivors of Groningen, but from its own shareholders, clutching their pearls at the audacity of an £8.6 million payday for CEO Wael Sawan.

Yes, Sawan—the man who makes eight figures while fending off climate lawsuits with one hand and greenwashing with the other—received a nearly £1 million raise last year. Apparently, polluting the planet, greenlighting LNG expansion, and flirting with a BP takeover is now a performance bonus category.

Shareholder advisory group Pirc, evidently one of the last functioning moral compasses in the City, has urged investors to vote against Shell’s executive pay and demand answers on how its liquefied natural gas (LNG) strategy squares with the company’s fairytale “net-zero by 2050” promise. Spoiler alert: it doesn’t.

Pirc went further, opposing the re-election of Chairman Sir Andrew Mackenzie, citing Shell’s climate governance as falling “significantly short.” Translation: Shell’s climate plan is so hollow, even a shareholder advocacy group noticed it wasn’t made of actual numbers or accountability.

But why stop at hypocrisy when you can add hostile takeovers to the mix?

Shell is reportedly licking its chops at the idea of gobbling up BP, whose market value has sunk to a measly £56 billion—less than half of Shell’s own puffed-up valuation. You can almost hear the calculators whirring as Shell’s M&A war room updates its “BP Acquisition Playbook” for the umpteenth time.

Of course, Wael Sawan claims he’d rather spend the cash on share buybacks. Sure, and I’d rather believe that Shell’s offshore drilling is good for coral reefs. Insiders say the bid isn’t just likely—it’s practically preheated in the oven, only waiting for the icing of shareholder apathy.

Meanwhile, ExxonMobil, Shell’s evil twin with even less PR finesse, may swoop in to snatch BP for itself. The Exxon-BP duo would create a fossil-fuel hydra so large it could probably power London just from its press releases. Plus, Exxon’s already eyeing BP’s energy trading desk like a vulture eyeing roadkill.

And let’s not forget the background orchestra of BlackRock, whose endless money faucet waters both Shell and BP like precious, carbon-belching bonsai trees. ESG policies? Just a minor footnote between dividend hikes and proxy votes.

In this oily theatre of the absurd, the UK government stands like a doorman at the Ritz, unsure whether to block the coming megamerger or offer Exxon a scone while BP’s independence gets auctioned off.

Shell wants to expand its LNG empire. Exxon wants a chunk of BP. Shareholders want fat returns. And the planet? It gets more PR campaigns, more emissions, and more empty promises while oil execs toast their success from gilded boardrooms that sit safely above sea level.

Welcome to the endgame of climate capitalism: where corporate titans feast, and the rest of us just get the fumes.

---

Graphic credit to royaldutchshellplc.com and John Donovan in collaboration with AI.

Disclosure: This article was generated with the support of AI and reviewed by an editor.

This website and sisters royaldutchshellgroup.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, shellnews.net, and shellwikipedia.com, are owned by John Donovan - more information here. There is also a Wikipedia segment.